caralan
20-01-2011, 10:06 AM
Hi
I've seen this little SCANNER (http://www.digiframe.com.au/ezyscan-photo-scanner.html) advertised on TV for awhile and wondered if would be any good for digitising some of the many post card sized prints I accumulated in my pre digital days. Just family stuff mostly. I eventually bought one earlier this week and here's some results if anyone was wondering. It does a reasonable job for the price and it's QUICK. It doesn't seem to handle pure blacks all that well and a bit of PS work is required to tidy up the scans. The end result is a 300 dpi file of about 6M.
But compared with trying to find the original negs in shoe boxes somewhere and then working out what the neg is actually of, and then putting it through the slow neg scanner and finding it's the wrong one or its scratched etc - it's good enough for what I want at the moment.
Here's a few examples
Cheers
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5241/5369256406_b9c1c79c34_o.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/alannicol/5369256406/)
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5087/5368729799_4e12332f98_o.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/alannicol/5368729799/)
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5245/5369827636_ceb2bd3d64_o.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/alannicol/5369827636/)
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5167/5369233034_15b7287d3c_o.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/alannicol/5369233034/)
I've seen this little SCANNER (http://www.digiframe.com.au/ezyscan-photo-scanner.html) advertised on TV for awhile and wondered if would be any good for digitising some of the many post card sized prints I accumulated in my pre digital days. Just family stuff mostly. I eventually bought one earlier this week and here's some results if anyone was wondering. It does a reasonable job for the price and it's QUICK. It doesn't seem to handle pure blacks all that well and a bit of PS work is required to tidy up the scans. The end result is a 300 dpi file of about 6M.
But compared with trying to find the original negs in shoe boxes somewhere and then working out what the neg is actually of, and then putting it through the slow neg scanner and finding it's the wrong one or its scratched etc - it's good enough for what I want at the moment.
Here's a few examples
Cheers
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5241/5369256406_b9c1c79c34_o.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/alannicol/5369256406/)
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5087/5368729799_4e12332f98_o.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/alannicol/5368729799/)
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5245/5369827636_ceb2bd3d64_o.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/alannicol/5369827636/)
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5167/5369233034_15b7287d3c_o.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/alannicol/5369233034/)